Learning scaffolding in preschool students with intellectual disability certifications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64478/wzhcqc27

Keywords:

Child development, Learning, School integration, Teachers, Intellectual disability

Abstract

This investigation sought a grasp on pedagogical approaches employing material, cognitive, and educational aids, utilized by educators in assisting young children facing intellectual disability. A qualitative empirical exploration, embracing phenomenological design and descriptive reach, was effectuated. Ten teacherstudent pairings willingly participated in this research. Each child had a officially recognized intellectual disability, aged four or five, and was enrolled in early childhood education programs within urban schools, in the Mendoza province of Argentina. Educators underwent individual semistructured interviews, subsequent to nonparticipatory classroom observations of their interactions with students. Data analysis adopted thematic categorical methods. Findings demonstrated instructors' deployment of cognitive resources, say, flexibility, as a foundational aspect of instructional scaffolding, along a host of material and educational strategies, all focused at nurturing pupils cognitive, emotional, plus social progression. These teaching methods furthermore demonstrated favorable effects upon both students’ selfdirection and consequential learning experiences. The central conclusion posits that educational scaffolding is a vital approach, vital to guarantee comprehensive and just education fitted to the specific needs of pupils. This examination furnishes worthy recommendations for embedding inclusive practices also shaping educational regulations in allied locales.

Author Biographies

  • Noelia Rocío Bastías, Universidad del Aconcagua

    Licenciada en Psicología y profesora universitaria en Psicología. Facultad de Psicología.

  • Daniela Fernanda González, Universidad Católica Argentina

    Licenciada en Psicología y Especialista en Investigación en Ciencias Sociales y Humanas. Docente universitaria.

References

Albán-Martínez, J. y Naranjo-Hidalgo, T. (2020). Inclusión educativa de estudiantes con discapacidad intelectual: un reto pedagógico para la educación formal. CEIT, 5(4), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2020.4.217

Anatolievna Zhizhko, E. (2020). Inclusión de los niños con capacidades diferentes en escuelas regulares en México: propósitos y realidad. Andamios, 17(43), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v17i43.774

Bhattacharjee, S. y Roy, P. (2022). The Effect of Scaffolding: As Instructional Technique on Differently Abled Students. Journal of Multidisciplinary, 7(2), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2022.v07.i02.008

Bosanquet, P. (2012). Turn taking, repair and topic practices in teaching assistant led literacy intervention sessions. Londres: Institute of Education, University of London.

Bruner, J. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Language & Communication, 1(2-3), 155-178.

Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad (12 de diciembre de 2006). Organización de las Naciones Unidas. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities

Debray, S. y Dehaene, S. (2025). Mapping and modeling the semantic space of math concepts. Cognition, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105971.

Delmastro, A. (2008). El andamiaje docente en el desarrollo de la lectura y la escritura en lengua extranjera. Paradigma, 29(1), 197-230. https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid=S1011-22512008000100011&script=sci_arttext

Dominguez-Lara, S. A. (2016). Content validity using Aiken's V with confidence intervals: contributions to Rodríguez et al. Archivos argentinos de pediatría, 114(3), e221-e223. https://europepmc.org/article/med/27164359

Ertugruloglu, E.; Mearns, T. y Admiraal, W. (2023). Scaffolding what, why and how? A critical thematic review study of descriptions, goals, and means of language scaffolding in Bilingual education contexts. Educational Research Review, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100550

Gibbs, G. (2014). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

Hernández Sampieri, R. y Mendoza Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (7a ed.). Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill.

Iglesias-Casal, I. y Coto-Ordás, V. (2024). Andamiaje y metacognición en las prácticas docentes: la dimensión afectivo-emocional del tutor. Didáctica, 36, 77-88. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/dill.85107

Ley Nacional 22431 (16 de marzo de 1981). Sistema de protección integral de discapacitados. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-22431-20620/texto

Ley Nacional 24901 (5 de noviembre de 1997). Sistema de prestaciones básicas en habilitación y rehabilitación integral a favor de las personas con discapacidad. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/47677/norma.htm

Ley Nacional 26206 (27 de diciembre de 2006). Ley de Educación Nacional. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/120000-124999/123542/norma.htm

Lipina, S. (2016). Pobre cerebro: los efectos de la pobreza sobre el desarrollo cognitivo y emocional, y lo que la neurociencia puede hacer para prevenirlos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Maksić, S. y Jošić, S. (2021). Scaffolding the development of creativity from the students’ perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100835

Martin, N.; Dornfeld, C. y Gnesdilow, D. (2019). Fading distributed scaffolds: the importance of complementarity between teacher and material scaffolds. Instr Sci, 47(1), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9474-0

Organización de los Estados Americanos [OEA] (2024). ¿Qué es Desarrollo Infantil Temprano? https://www.oas.org/udse/dit2/que-es/default.aspx

Santos Sánchez, M. F. (2025). Pedagogía inclusiva y desarrollo infantil en discapacidad: revisión crítica de enfoques y estrategias actuales. Pedagogical Constellations, 4(1), 295-323. https://doi.org/10.69821/constellations.v4i1.100

Serrano Argüeso, M. (2025). Intellectual disability and borderline intellectual ability: keys for a better labour market insertion. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 15(3), 790-817. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2170.

Wood, D.; Bruner, J. y Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://sachafund.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/wood_et_al-1976-journal_of_child_psychology_and_psychiatry.pdf

Xenofontos, N.; Hovardas, T.; Zacharia, Z. y Jong, T. (2019). Inquiry-based learning and retrospective action: Problematizing student work in a computer-supported learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12384

Yousef, A. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 966-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12536.

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Learning scaffolding in preschool students with intellectual disability certifications. (2026). Revista Salud, Educación Y Sociedad, 5(2), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.64478/wzhcqc27